Lincoln Douglas Outline Essay

Before you begin your reference briefly thank the judge and your opponent for providing the opportunity for this important debate.I. Engage With an Attention-Getter.The attention-getter is designed to intrigue the interview members and to motivate them to listen attentively for the next several minutes. There are infinite possibilities for attention-getting devices. most of the more common devices include using a story, a surprising statistic, or a quotation. Whichever you choose, be undisputable that your attention-getter makes sense to the case and that it is explained.See more argument essay formatII. Provide a Resolutional Analysis.Say the precise wording of the topic so your judge knows exactly what is being debated. Explain what the endurance is asking most require that you choose between two surveys (ex. Resolved Individuality should be valued above community), other topics have implied values which require a little more explanation.III. Offer Definitions.Clearly define the vital words/phrases in the gag law and cite the dictionary or encyclopedia you used. Make sure the definitions you choose support what you are arguing definitions matter sometimes they set who wins and loses the debateIV. Propose a Value.A value is an ideal held by individuals, societies, or governments that serves as the highest conclusion to be protected/achieved. In general, the debater will establish a value which focuses the central questions of the resultant and will serve as a foundation for argumentation. Explain how the value relates to the topic.V. Offer a Criterion.You should move over a criterion (a standard) which should be used toExplain how the value should be protected, respected, maximized, or achieved. Measure whether a given side or argument protects, respects, maximizes, or achieves the value. The relationship between the value and the criterion should be clearly stated.VI. Present ch aloneenger 1.Provide a tagline or brief title to the argument. Int roduce the take over or argument you are making (ex. Capital penalization deters crime). Introduce your warrant the close your claim is true. Offer valid evidence that supports your claim (ex. According to the Attorney General, states that have the death penalisation have less violent crime). Explain the impact of your argument on the debate. Be sure to relate your argument back to the resolution and explain how this argument helps to uphold the value (ex. Because capital punishment decreases crime it upholds Justice, which is the most important value in todays round).VII. Present Contention 2.Is the claim clear? Is valid evidence offered? Is the warrant clear? (Is the piece of evidence explained, how does it apply to the resolution?) Is enough evidence offered to promote the claim? Does the case explain how this piece of evidence helps to uphold the value?VIII. Present Contention 3.Same as Contention 1 and 2 aboveIX. End the linguistic process with a Solid Conclusion.Review the main points of the case, especially the value. Use the criterion to weigh the case (or prove how your arguments best support the value). Provide a final thought that refers back to the attention-getter. Ask for the win (ex. For all these reasons I can see nothing but an affirmative ballot).